Attorney Douglas Laycock leaves after arguing before the Supreme Court on behalf of an Arkansas prison inmate who says his Muslim beliefs that require him to grow a beard are being violated by prison rules that prevent beards, Tuesday, Oct. 7, 2014, in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, reprinted with permission from The Associated Press)
Douglas Laycock (1948 - ) is one of the nation’s foremost religious liberty experts and a law professor at the University of Virginia. Laycock is not only one of the nation’s foremost academics, but he also argues religious-liberty cases before the United States Supreme Court. He is known for protecting religious liberty principles from both sides of the culture war. He has advocated for same-sex couples and conservative Christians. He also has argued both Free Exercise and Establishment Clause cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Born in Alton, Illinois, Laycock earned his undergraduate degree from Michigan State University and his law degree from the University of Chicago Law School. In his storied academic career, he has taught at the University of Chicago Law School, the University of Texas School of Law, the University of Michigan Law School, and the University of Virginia School of Law.
Laycock has argued five First Amendment or First Amendment-related cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, including Holt v. Hobbs (2015), Town of Greece v. Galloway (2014), Hosanna Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC (2012), City of Boerne v. Flores (1997), Church of Lukumi Babalu Avenue v. City of Hialeah (1993).
In three of those cases – Holt v. Hobbs, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC, and Church of Lukumi Babalu – he won unanimous decisions before the Supreme Court. In Holt, the Court unanimously ruled that Arkansas prison officials violated the religious liberty rights of an inmate under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by prohibiting him from wearing a short beard. In Hosanna-Tabor, the Court unanimously ruled that the ministerial exception prevented a court from examining whether a church’s school discriminated against a former teacher. In Lukumi, the Court ruled that a Florida city violated the Free Exercise Clause rights of a church when it targeted the church’s animal sacrifice practices.
Laycock is vice president of the American Law Institute and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Send Feedback on this article