Information to MTSU Faculty who work with Human Subjects
- Protocols are prescreened within 4 days of submission. You will receive an email
at the completion of this process. If you do not receive an email, then please contact
us.
-
It generally takes two weeks for protocols to be reviewed after the IRB office has
prescreened them and confirmed the application packet to be complete.
-
The MTSU IRB receives a higher number of applications during September-October and
February-March. We request your patience during these months. The MTSU IRB continues
to receive IRB applications during the summer break (June-August).
This page is expected to help MTSU faculty community who may be required to obtain
IRB approval or sponsor a student for IRB approval. Faculty research could come under
one or more of these categories:
- Class project - the faculty is a course director of an MTSU educational program that
requires the collection of data from human subjects
- Sponsor - the faculty member may either be an academic advisor or research supervisor
of a student whose research involves humans. The faculty member may not be the primary
beneficiary of the research outcomes.
- Independent - faculty is either a PI or an active co-investigator in a study involving
human participants - faculty members who come under this category are usually familiar
with the IRB processes and may need very minor assistance. The faculty member can
have students or postdocs to conduct several tasks within the study but the faculy
member is the chief beneficiary of the research outcome.
Training
Regardless of which of the above category the faculty comes under, he/she must complete
CITI training in order to be eligible for the designated role. Since students do
not have the Institutional authority, it is unfair to delegate them with responsibilities
that may potentially cause irreversible challenges to their academic status. Hence,
the IRB requires that the faculty in charge to be adequately trained in human subject
research and be familiar with various IRB procedures. As a first step, we encourage
faculty to view the following informative videos available through OHRP to understand
the history and role of IRB in human subject research:
The above videos are expected to provide an overall understanding, but merely watching
them does not meet the MTSU's human subject training requirement. Once you have watched
these video clips, please visit CITI program www.citiprogram.org to complete your training.
- First-time users must register for an account using your official name (Ensure your first and last names you provide to CITI matches your MTSU records and
your IRB applications)
- A series of questions by the CITI portal to automatically determine which training
module would most fit your need.
- Faculty and staff must complete the "Social and Behavioral Research" course AND applicable "optional" modules depending the type of research and kind
of participants.
- In mst instances, the Office of Research Compliance will be able to access your course
completion information. However, be prepared to provide proof of certification if
directed by IRB or the Office of Research Compliance.
-
1. Faculty Serving as a Sponsor
The faculty may either serve as an academic advisor or as a thesis mentor to a student
who conducts research that involves data collection from living human subjects. In
some instances, you may be an MTSU staff who has been assigned to mentor student research
projects. We have encountered several scenarios where the faculty mentor's primary
field of interest may not entail human subjects. There may be a secondary interest
that connects the student research project and the faculty. Or in some cases, the
faculty advisor was designated to a student by the academic affairs and the student
decides to work with humans. But regardless of the reason, the faculty sponsor is
assigned with the institutional authority and the consequent regulatory responsibility.
The main responsibility is to ensure that the student is compliant. Therefore,
it is essential that the study sponsor is familiar with IRB steps and the regulatory
responsibilities before accepting to mentor a student.
1.1 Application Procedure
Depending on the type of research the student plans to conduct, there may be different
sets of paper work he/she would be required to submit. If this is your first time
sponsoring a student, the Office of Research Compliance encourages you to email
irb_information@mtsu.edu and request a meeting to advise you on how to proceed. In most instances, please
be aware that the student you sponsor must provide the following mandatory items for
your review before you can forward the application packet to the IRB:
- Fully completed application form for your endorsement or signature - please note a
physical "ink" signature is not necessary. Entering your name in the signature field
using MS word is sufficient. Submit the original Word document to allowMTSU IRB to
capture your signature and other embedded macros.
- Exempt form - READ
- Expedited form - READ
- Full Review form - READ
- Informed consent document - READ
- Recruitment material, such as flyers, email transcript, etc - VIEW
- Proof that the student has completed CITI training
- Applicable permission letters if the study is conducted outside MTSU
- Study instruments, such as surveys - the student should ensure that all of the modules
work before sending for IRB review if he/she will conduct the study through an online
site
Please review the application and the supporting documents for completeness and submit the
application packet via a single email to
irb_submissions@mtsu.edu once you have indicated your approval by entering your name and date. Please DO
NOT collate the files together but instead attach them separately. Enclose a note
in the email to clearly indicate that you will be supporting the student and you
will be responsible for the post-approval regulatory processes (
READ). It may make the process swifter if you would also copy the research team, including
the student PI when you email the packet. This will also enable the student to respond
to any reviewer questions making the process swifter. Always use MTSU email ID when
applicable.
1.2 Sponsors' Responsibilities
Please be aware that if a student is required to either generate an expedited application
or asked to attend a full committee review, it is very critical that the student gets
guidance from an advisor who has working experience with IRB matters. Therefore,
you may request the student in such instances to invite a faculty co-investigator
who is specialized in human subject research. It is essential that you are aware
of the activities of the research and ensure the protocol is followed without any
deviation. In the event there are deviations, immediately report non-compliance to
the compliance hotline
compliance@mtsu.edu. Also, familiarize yourself with the responsibilities of the Principal Investigator
(PI) (
READ) and the post-approval responsibilities (
READ) of the research team. Even accidental violations of the approved protocol may
result in the withdrawal of the data leading to serious consequences to the students'
academic status.
In addition to the critical role during the approval process, the sponsor is also
charged with additional post-approval responsibilities. Since the PI is a student,
all of the responsibilities are shared between the sponsor and the PI (
READ). Moreover, the sponsor to ensure that the research-related records and documents
are stored properly in accordance with the approved protocol for at least three (3)
years after the data collection has ceased. Therefore it is important that the sponsor
is familiar with the post-approval tasks
(READ).
Please visit the IRB's FAQ page for specific information.
Click
2. Faculty Responsible for Class Projects
The faculty is most likely a course director or someone who is responsible for a class
which involves conducting a small human subject study as part of the curriculum. The
responsible individual could be full time faculty, temporary faculty, part-time faculty,
staff or even an adjunct faculty. Regardless of their rank and affiliation with MTSU,
their compliance role is the same as that of what is described under "Sponsor" in
the previous section. The faculty now has two options to consider from: (1) an IRB
approval can be requested for the entire class project, by the faculty - also called
as "standing protocol;" or (2) have the students apply for individual IRB approval
- referred to as "student-initiated protocol." There are a few factors that need
to be considered before a choice is made.
2.1 Standing Protocols
This process is useful in instances where the IRB experience is not the focus of the
curriculum but the students would conduct a short study to meet their academic requirements.
The course director then designs the methods of the study and takes ownership of
the research. Once the research framework is constructed, the faculty member would
apply for an IRB approval as a principal investigator (PI) through a work flow described in
the "Application Procedure" described above. Student researchers will not be added
at the application stage. Depending on the type of research design, the application
needs to be furnished in appropriate format and it will be reviewed accordingly. Since
the class requirements are unique, it is essential that the faculty member consults
with the Office of Research Compliance for a clear guidance on what supporting documents
will be required. Once the protocol is approved, the faculty, can request for amendments
to include student researchers AFTER the students have successfully completed their
CITI training.
Please note that this protocol set up may be a one-time time commitment for the faculty.
If the class project involves minimal risk and it qualifies for exemption, the IRB
approval for the class is valid for several years. If the class project is reviewed
under the expedited or full committee review mechanism, then it is valid for 3 years
with a few requirements. The protocol can be extended beyond 3 years in most cases.
The Office of Research Compliance recommends course directors to consider this mechanism
if the student research part of the course is short and is not a major component of
the curriculum. The responsibilities of the students who would like to register through
this option are provided in the student information page (READ).
This MTSU IRB has issued standing protocols for a few a classes as a test. Based
on the limited data, the students are expected to face the following advantages and
disadvantages when the research of a class project is conducted through this mechanism:
Advantages:
- The "standing protocol" has preassigned procedures so the students do not have to
do much other than completing their appropriate CITI training
- The class coordinator handles all of the compliance-related issues and the students
just concentrate on completing their project
- For the faculty, records keeping is limited to just one protocol. As described later,
the course director is responsible for all of the research activities carried out
through the class which includes records keeping. By using this mechanism, the course
director does not have to worry about multiple protocols for each class.
Disadvantages:
- This mechanism allows less flexibility for the students to customize their research
design
- The student cannot continue the project for higher studies
- The student will also miss out on the education experience of developing a human subject
research protocol and participating in the IRB review process
- For the faculty, the initial IRB approval process may be time consuming and stressful
2.2 Student-initiated Protocols
The students MUST complete CITI training before the class semester starts and they have to inform the class coordinator that
the student will be requesting an individual protocol. This stream is expected to
have the following implications to the students:
Advantages:
- The student receives a first hand experience of the IRB process
- Independence in research design for the student, but the faculty has to ensure that
the design is compliant
- Possibility for publication
- Provision to carry the study to be part of future research ventures - like thesis,
dissertation, request funding, etc.
Disadvantages:
- May be very challenging and sometimes very stressful for both student as well as the
faculty
- Time consuming if not dealt with properly - IRB approval may take anywhere between
2-4 weeks leaving very little time for completing the project.
- A clear direction may not be available - the regulatory conditions can often be study-specific
The protocol application must be carried out as described above in the "Application
Procedure" subsection. Within this provision, the course director will have the same
responsibility as a Sponsor.
2.3 Course Director's Responsibilities
Regardless whether the course director used a "standing protocol" mechanism or he/she
allowed a student-initiated application, the records keeping responsibilities and
communicating with the Office of Research Compliance for pre- and post-approval processes
are charged to the course director. However, the "standing protocol" mechanism will
allow reduced work load for the course director. But it is essential that the course
director makes his/her choice such that the academic goals are met adequately.
If the course director is not familiar with the IRB procedures, it is essential to
be aware that the students must receive proper guidance in the event a student is
required to either generate an expedited application or asked to attend a full committee
review. Therefore, the course director must consider inviting or allow to student to
request a different faculty member who is specialized in human subject research to
be a co-mentor in the study. It is also important to note that course director must
be aware of all of the activities of the research and ensure the protocol is followed
without any deviation. In the event there are deviations, immediately report non-compliance
to the compliance hotline
compliance@mtsu.edu. Also, familiarize yourself with the responsibilities of the Principal Investigator
(PI) (
READ) and the post-approval responsibilities (
READ) of the research team. Even accidental violations of the approved protocol may
result in the withdrawal of the data leading to serious consequences to the students'
academic status.
In addition to the critical role during the approval process, the faculty sponsor is
also charged with additional post-approval responsibilities. Since the PI is a student,
all of the responsibilities are shared between the sponsor and the PI (
READ). Moreover, the sponsor to ensure that the research-related records and documents
are stored properly in accordance with the approved protocol for at least three (3)
years after the data collection has ceased. Therefore it is important that the sponsor
is familiar with the post-approval tasks
(READ).
Please visit the FAQ page for specific information.
Click
3. Faculty Conducting Independent Study
The faculty may either serve as a PI or a specialist co-investigator in a study. If
the faculty is also the PI, then he/she is charged with all of the regulatory responsibilities.
Please note that the faculty member will be allowed to have students or postdocs
to work in the proposed research and "independent" does not mean the faculty member
would conduct the study alone.
3.1 Application Procedure
Depending on the type of research, there may be different sets of paper work he/she
would be required to submit. In general, the PI must provide the following mandatory
documents:
- Fully filled application form
- Exempt form - READ
- Expedited form - READ
- Full Review form - READ
- Informed consent document - READ
- Working with minors the researchers have to provide a template for parental consent
and child assent
- In rare cases, a waiver to consent may be granted. The researcher has to submit a
consent waiver form - READ
- Recruitment material, such as flyers, email transcript, etc - VIEW
- Applicable permission letters if the study is conducted outside MTSU
- Study instruments, such as surveys - the PI should ensure that all of the modules
work before sending for IRB review if study will be conducted online
Once you are assured that the application is complete, submit the application packet
via email to irb_submissions@mtsu.edu. DO NOT COLLATE all the files together. Attach the files separately in the same
email. It may make the process swifter if you would also copy the research team,
including any student researchers when you email the packet. This will also enable
the students to respond to any reviewer questions making the process swifter. Always
use MTSU email ID when applicable. Incomplete applications that lack all the necessary
documentation will not be reviewed. The Office of Research Compliance will return
incomplete applications without any administrative action(s).
3.2 Responsibilities
If you have student co-investigators, as a faculty PI, you are required to provide
adequate guidance to the students and interns. In the event there are deviations,
immediately report non-compliance to the compliance hotline
compliance@mtsu.edu. Also, familiarize yourself with the responsibilities of the PI (
READ) and the post-approval responsibilities (
READ) of the research team. Please be aware that even accidental violations of the approved
protocol may result in the withdrawal of the data.
Please visit the FAQ page for specific information.
Click
New Faculty members who have recently accepted a position at MTSU can also call 615
494 8918.